HUMAN ADAPTATION презентация

HUMAN ADAPTATION 
 Name - Choubey Ankit Kumar 
 Group -HUMAN ADAPTATION
 Human have biological plasticity,or an ability to adapt biologicallyIntroduction 
 Human adaptation to environmental change is both a newHuman adaptation to environmental change is best understood over long temporalApplying the adaptation process framework in a case study in SouthRETHINKING ADAPTATION IN MANAGING CHANGE IN BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITYRETHINKING ADAPTATION IN MANAGING CHANGE IN BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY



Слайды и текст этой презентации
Слайд 1
Описание слайда:
HUMAN ADAPTATION Name - Choubey Ankit Kumar Group - 191A Supervisor - Anna zhukova


Слайд 2
Описание слайда:
HUMAN ADAPTATION Human have biological plasticity,or an ability to adapt biologically to our environment An Adaption is any variation that can increase once biological fitness in a specific environment More simply it is the successful interaction of a population with it’s environment

Слайд 3
Описание слайда:
Introduction Human adaptation to environmental change is both a new imperative in the face of climate change and the oldest problem in our species’ history (Smithers and Smit 1997; NRC 1999; Janssen and Ostrom 2006; IPCC 2014). Human societies have always been subject to risks and vulnerabilities posed by changes in their material circumstances as a result of social, economic, ecological, and other environmental factors (Moran 2008). The diverse processes by which societies have dealt with social and environmental change throughout their history on the land and sea are well established in the scientific literature (Fagan 2008; Leichenko and Eisenhauer 2017). Humans have evolved a wide range of strategies in response to localised environmental changes, which have contributed strongly to specific social and ecological developments, including both biocultural diversification and homogenization (Smithers and Smits 1997; Moran 2008). The evolving set of locally driven, ‘bottom-up’ responses to environmental change is often collectively termed autonomous adaptation (Carter et al. 1994), while its obverse, planned adaptation, is typically used to reference ‘top-down’ (from without or State-driven) efforts to adjust a society, community or social-ecological system to existing or anticipated environmental change, as in climate adaptation (Fankhauser et al. 1999; Howard and Pecl unpublished results

Слайд 4
Описание слайда:

Слайд 5
Описание слайда:

Слайд 6
Описание слайда:

Слайд 7
Описание слайда:
Human adaptation to environmental change is best understood over long temporal scales. The pace of environmental and social change is often slow and multigenerational, although it may become rapid when societal or planetary boundaries, or system thresholds (so-called tipping points), are exceeded (cf. Rockström et al. 2009; Raworth 2012, 2017; Howard 2013; Steffen et al. 2015). Similarly, localised plant and animal communities may take time to adjust to changes in climatic conditions. Over time, these shifts are manifested in changes in the structure, health, and diversity of ecological communities (Walther et al. 2002; Campbell et al. 2009). The critical nexus for human adaptation, then, is not so much change in global temperature or precipitation regimes, but rather the consequent and relevant local changes in biodiversity that support the web of life. As discussed in Howard (unpubl. results), species’ invasions can occur in a very short time frame, and can also provoke rapid human responses—thus providing a ‘real-time’ prospective for analysing human adaptation to biodiversity change Human adaptation to environmental change is best understood over long temporal scales. The pace of environmental and social change is often slow and multigenerational, although it may become rapid when societal or planetary boundaries, or system thresholds (so-called tipping points), are exceeded (cf. Rockström et al. 2009; Raworth 2012, 2017; Howard 2013; Steffen et al. 2015). Similarly, localised plant and animal communities may take time to adjust to changes in climatic conditions. Over time, these shifts are manifested in changes in the structure, health, and diversity of ecological communities (Walther et al. 2002; Campbell et al. 2009). The critical nexus for human adaptation, then, is not so much change in global temperature or precipitation regimes, but rather the consequent and relevant local changes in biodiversity that support the web of life. As discussed in Howard (unpubl. results), species’ invasions can occur in a very short time frame, and can also provoke rapid human responses—thus providing a ‘real-time’ prospective for analysing human adaptation to biodiversity change

Слайд 8
Описание слайда:
Applying the adaptation process framework in a case study in South India We applied the adaptation processes-to-pathways framework to a case of rapid human adaptation to biodiversity change, specifically, to the proliferation of the invasive plant Lantana camara. (‘red sage’ or ‘lantana’) in Karnataka, southern India. We chose this case of established but ongoing biodiversity change because Lantana’s impacts are prolific and profound, and thus is reflective of the kind of environmental changes to which humans have long been contributing and adapting (Bhagwat et al. 2012; Howard 2013).

Слайд 9
Описание слайда:

Слайд 10
Описание слайда:
RETHINKING ADAPTATION IN MANAGING CHANGE IN BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY

Слайд 11
Описание слайда:
RETHINKING ADAPTATION IN MANAGING CHANGE IN BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY

Слайд 12
Описание слайда:

Слайд 13
Описание слайда:

Слайд 14
Описание слайда:

Слайд 15
Описание слайда:

Слайд 16
Описание слайда:


Скачать презентацию на тему HUMAN ADAPTATION можно ниже:

Похожие презентации